Foreign media the United States deployed in South Korea Sade intended to beat China – Sohu news actv

Foreign media: the United States deployed "Sade" to beat China Sohu News Korea 15 people in front of the tiles protest deployment "Sade" system in Korea in South Korea (peaceone Reference News Network reported on February 18th Australia Lloyd interpretation website dated 17 February entitled "" Sade "of Chinese beat than the North Korean missile a more effective" article, Australian National University Strategic Defense Research Center scholar Raoul? Heinrich said in the article, Beijing is worried about "Sade" deployed to the Korean Peninsula, the United States may be used to China their strategic planning problem. This suspicion is not entirely groundless. The U.S. response to North Korea is a fake article said that recently, North Korea conducted a fourth nuclear test in January, and then again this month fired a rocket, prompting Seoul to immediately began negotiating with Washington to speed up the deployment of terminal high altitude area defense system (i.e., "Sade" system). China strongly opposes it. Politically, the deployment of this equipment is an affront to China’s prestige and its growing sense of responsibility as the security arbiter of the Korean peninsula. From a more practical point of view, Beijing is worried about the deployment of Sade to the Korean Peninsula, especially the equipment has sophisticated X band radar, so that the coverage of radar covers a large part of China’s territory. It could be used by the United States to create problems for China’s own strategic planning, especially if it was combined with other ballistic missile defense systems in the region. This suspicion is not entirely groundless. On the surface, the upgrade of the ballistic missile defense system in Korea seems to be the natural policy response to the continuous expansion of the area of the missile threat and the continuous improvement of its quality. However, as long as careful study of "specific technical indicators Sade", look at the geographical features of the Korean Peninsula, the peninsula formed strict geographical conditions that can be used for the attacker and defender of missile types, we find that for most South Korean reality defense emergencies, "Sade" system is not suitable for. South Korea has a small area, and Seoul, with a population of more than 1/4, is only about 40 kilometers from the border between Korea and korea. And the design goal of "Sade" is to intercept the incoming missiles in the atmosphere or outside the atmosphere at high altitude. That is to say, the most effective role of this system is to intercept medium range and long-range ballistic missiles. There is a paradox: North Korea is unlikely to use "Sade" best interception of missiles against South Korea; or to say, "Sade" to intercept most likely used against South Korea, especially in Seoul and the surrounding areas of strategic value of short-range ballistic missiles and tactical ballistic missile is almost useless or completely useless. The article said that North Korea’s long-range ballistic missiles are not suitable for combating South Korea, while "Sade" is clearly unable to deal with these intercontinental missiles. The Korean Peninsula is only 1100 kilometers long, and the intercontinental ballistic missile has a range of more than 5500 kilometers. In addition, the missile is expensive and difficult to manufacture, and the number of the DPRK is very limited. The result is that these missiles are not used within the war zone, but should be understood as the backbone of North Korea’s urgent nuclear deterrent to the United states. ; 外媒:美国在韩部署“萨德”意在敲打中国-搜狐新闻   韩国民众15日在青瓦台前抗议美在韩部署“萨德”系统(peaceone   参考消息网2月18日报道澳大利亚洛伊解读者网站2月17日刊发题为《“萨德”对中国的敲打比朝鲜导弹更管用》的署名文章,国立澳大利亚大学战略国防研究中心学者拉乌尔?海因里希斯在文章中称,北京担心“萨德”部署到朝鲜半岛,有可能被美国用来给中国自己的战略规划制造难题。这种疑虑并非全然毫无根据。   美国应对朝鲜是假   文章称,最近,朝鲜在1月份进行了第四次核试验,接着本月又发射了火箭,促使首尔立即与华盛顿开始商讨加速部署末段高空区域防御系统(即“萨德”系统)。   中国对此强烈反对。从政治上来说,部署这一装备是对中国的声望以及它作为朝鲜半岛安全头号仲裁人越来越强烈的责任感的冒犯。从更实际的角度来说,北京担心“萨德”部署到朝鲜半岛,尤其是该装备拥有精密的X波段雷达,可以让雷达的覆盖范围涵盖中国很大一部分领土。这有可能被美国用来给中国自己的战略规划制造难题,特别是将这一装备与该地区其他弹道导弹防御系统联用的话。这种疑虑并非全然毫无根据。   文章称,表面上看,韩国升级弹道导弹防御系统似乎是面对导弹威胁在面积上不断扩大、质量上不断提升所作出的自然政策因应。然而,只要仔细研究一下“萨德”的具体技术指标,再看看朝鲜半岛的地理特征,半岛的地理条件对攻击者和防御者所能使用的导弹种类形成严格的制约,我们就会发现对于韩国多数现实的防御突发情况来说,“萨德”系统非常不适合。   韩国面积比较小,聚集了逾四分之一人口的首尔距离韩朝边界只有大约40公里。而“萨德”的设计目标是在高空拦截大气层内或大气层外的来袭导弹,也就是说这种系统最有效的作用是拦截中程和远程弹道导弹。这就出现了一种悖论:朝鲜不大可能用“萨德”拦截效果最好的导弹来打击韩国;或者说,“萨德”对于拦截最有可能用来打击韩国、特别是具有战略价值的首尔及周边地区的短程弹道导弹和战术弹道导弹几乎没用或者完全没用。   文章称,朝鲜的远程弹道导弹完全不适于用来打击韩国,同时“萨德”明显无法对付这些洲际导弹。朝鲜半岛只有1100公里长,而洲际弹道导弹的射程在5500公里以上。   此外,这种导弹造价高昂,制造难度极高,朝鲜拥有的数量非常有限。其结果是,这些导弹不是“战区内”使用,而应理解为朝鲜对美国的紧急核威慑的支柱。实际上,即便是要从韩国拦截这种打击美国的导弹,也必须在大约1分钟内做出反应,而这时导弹还处于助推阶段。目前,任何弹道导弹防御系统都没有这个能力,更不用说“萨德”了。   敲打牵制中国是真   既然“萨德”用于应对朝鲜半岛突发事件的实际效用有限,那么为什么现在关于它的讨论热度这么高?   文章称,用澳大利亚战略政策研究所分析人士罗德?莱昂的话说,在一定意义上,这种讨论反映出华盛顿和首尔可资对付朝鲜威胁的有效手段很少。没有好的选择,华盛顿又觉得必须做出极具象征意义的样子,让大家看到美国“确实有所行动”,以便安抚盟友。首尔很清楚“萨德”的效用有限,但是它迫切希望安抚国民,所以没有办法,只好谈部署“萨德”了。   另一种解释与中国有关。正如北京所怀疑的,华盛顿最有可能做的是,利用朝鲜的好战制造有效的借口,开始在中国外围部署探测设备。“萨德”用来应对朝鲜的突发行为固然没有多大用处,但是用它来牵制中国有限的导弹攻击却是很实用的。更重要的大概是,这种装备的雷达系统还可能用于给中国在东亚其他地方的计划制造难题。   文章称,无论是首尔还是华盛顿,这种战略的背后都有一定程度的胁迫逻辑。它们在不同时期都试图将朝鲜问题外包给中国,都曾对北京作出重大让步,期待中国能够利用影响力制止平壤。每次这些希望都因为朝鲜新一轮的挑衅行为而破灭,接着是中国的外交淡化处理。对北京使用胡萝卜政策失败后,它们现在尝试使用大棒政策。   引发韩国政界反对   另据拉美社2月16日报道,韩国多位政治人物今天继续对美国在该国部署反导弹系统表示反对,认为这缺乏可操作性,对生命构成了威胁,而且会引发亚洲紧张局势的升级。   报道称,反对派多名议员认为,部署“萨德”系统将造成与中俄的紧张升级。该系统具备了辐射中俄两国的能力。   “萨德”系统可以击落中远程弹道导弹。所以,批评人士认为这并没有必要,因为来自平壤的导弹并不需要这种高空拦截系统。   韩国主要在野党的议员李钟杰表示,他领导的政党不会接受就在朝鲜半岛部署反导弹系统进行的任何谈判。他说,这是美国的一种战略,不只针对朝鲜,还包括了俄罗斯和中国,而中国是韩国最主要的经济伙伴。   报道称,“萨德”系统的反对者考虑的另一因素是,该系统将会给人类造成有害的辐射影响,并导致电子设备瘫痪。   美国增加部署导弹防御系统符合五角大楼制定的重返亚太战略,以及针对中国崛起的力量再平衡策略。    相关的主题文章:

About hanson 9147 Articles
y6c1aPLKl$lO5k7REpe8jw1Z